Native Americans in “The Pearl” by John Steinbeck Essay

Steinbecks The free fall is one of his most intriguing pieces. Steinbeck manages to fit many divergent ideas into a short novella that is under a hundred pages. However, what makes The Pearl truly a great book is his critique of colonial society, and the interaction of endemic Ameri posteriors and colonists. Steinbeck emphasizes the differences surrounded by the colonists and the native Indians by using such symbols as the relationship between town and village, gentility, and instinct. Steinbeck besides shows that he views changing ones station, or attempting to, as foolish and impossible, exactly that trying to is needed to provide an example for others.Steinbeck practice sessions the differences between town and village as a metaphor for the differences between the colonists and the essential Americans. Steinbeck shows how he uses the stark differences between the huts of the innate Americans and the grand villas of the colonists in the following quoteThey came to the pla ce where the brush houses stopped and the metropolis of stone and plaster began, the city of harsh outer walls and inner cool gardens where a little water played and the bougainvillea crusted where walls with purple and brick-red and white. (Steinbeck, pg. 8)In this quote, Steinbeck emphasizes the stark difference between the village, do of simple materials, and the town, made of expensive materials. Steinbeck in like manner uses the towns buildings as a metaphor for the people deep down, as Steinbeck describes the buildings as having harsh outer walls, but having inner cool gardens. This could be a metaphor for the people within the building, portraying the people inside them as, at once, very kind and nice, but except once those walls had been let down. This shows the colonists as world very xenophobic, and being kind to their own race but harsh to other races.Steinbeck reinforces the idea that the colonists were animated remediate than the autochthonic Americans in the fo llowing quoteThe procession left the brush houses and entered the stone and plaster city where the streets were a little wider and there was a delimit pavement beside the buildings. (Steinbeck, pg. 47)Steinbeck shows that the primeval Americans saw the colonists living conditions as let out than theirs, and that the streets were a little wider, which could be seen as a commentary for most things, and that in most things, what the colonists lived a little better.Steinbeck here tells us, and when combined with the quote above, the colonists are living better than the Native Americans. Because the colonists have plenty of resources, and the Native Americans are not living in the luxury of the colonists, it indicates an unfair share of wealth, which is oddly skewed in the favor of the colonists. This reinforces the already presented idea that the colonists are, overall, living better than the Native Americans.Steinbecks following way to differentiate between the colonists and the Na tive Americans is using their instinctual actions. Steinbeck shows that the colonists and Native Americans are instinctively different, therefrom he attempts to give an excuse, or perhaps a reason, for the differences between them, and their outcomes. Steinbeck explores into the instinctual differences between the Native Americans and the colonists in the following quotesThere was sorrow in kinos rage, but this last thing had tightened him beyond breaking. He was an savage now, for hiding, for attacking, and he lived scarce to protect himself and his family despite his need for a canoe,never once did it occur to him to take one of the canoes of his neighbor. (Steinbeck, pg. 42)He could kill the doctor more slow than he could talk to him, for all of the doctors race radius to all of Kinos race as though they were simple animals. (Steinbeck, pg. 9)Once again, we can see the recurring theme that the Native Americans have belong whatever the colonists mold them to be, and as seen in the second quote, Steinbeck says that the doctors race spoke to all of Kinos race as though they were simple animals, and Steinbeck says in the first quote that Kino was an animal now. This shows that Kino, and his people as a whole, have become what the colonists have made them, and that they have become whatever the colonists wished them to be. This shows that the colonists control every facet of Native American life, and that anything that they want to be done depart be done.Steinbeck shows that the colonists have been raised with the instinctive belief that they were above the Native Americans, and that they were better than the Native AmericansHave I got nothing better to do than cure insect bites for little Indians? I am a doctor, not a veterinary. (Steinbeck,pg. 11)This shows that the doctor theory that the Indians were animals, and because of the fact that the colonists have been molding the Indians beliefs, the Indians thought that they were animals, perhaps resulting in the instinctive animal behavior. Steinbeck says in the previous quote that the colonists treated Kinos race like that, so perhaps it has become an instinctual reaction to the oppression of the colonists.Steinbeck says that Kino was an animal who lived only to protect himself and his family, showing that he did it as an instinctive defense, and that he only becomes an animal to protect his family. Steinbeck also emphasizes that Kino becomes his animal assumed name only when he needs to hide or protect himself. This shows that Kinos people have developed this as a natural defense, and its use is only for defense. This also shows that his people developed it for need of defense, and that continual need of protection is the only reason such a protection would be needed, and there is only one source for this continuous onslaught, and that is the colonists.Steinbeck also goes so far as to say that the instinctive animal that Kino becomes retains all of the qualities that Kino retains, even so far as his lack of will to steal from his own kind. This shows that Kinos alias does not explore survival of Kino as a person, but Kinos race as a whole. He is unwilling to take from his people, as his alias is unwilling to damage itself. If his alias is for the protection of a whole radical of people, then they must be under attack from a large group of people, giving us the structure of the assumption that the colonist society persecutes the Native Americans and the Native Americans have developed instincts for their protection.the strangers came with argument and authority and gunpowder to back up both. And in the four hundred years since, Kinos people had learned only one defense- a beautiful slitting of the eyes and a slight tightening of the lips and a retirement. Nothing could break down this wall, and they could remain whole within the wall. (Steinbeck, pg. 17)In this quote Steinbeck shows another instinct, reclusion behind an inner shell, the creation of which ha s been directly colligate to the coming of colonist society. However,this reaction shows more of the actual standpoint of the Native American society, as reactive, and unable to be proactive. This reactivity means that the situation will remain the same, and if this was the way that Kinos ancestors were and will be, then this situation will remain the same until stopped by outside intervention.This also shows that the Native American society has chosen to preserve itself within their shell, and to submit outside of it. Whenever attacked outside of the shell, they shelter inside their shell of refusal to change, as shown in the above quote. This results in the situation remaining a perfect clone of the situation that it was when it started, resulting in continuing colonist oppression. If the only place that they can take refuge is within personal shell, then they cannot control anything outside their shell, and they are therefore powerless outside their shell.The colonist society, a s a whole, exerts their control over the Native American population using the yoke of education.This is our one chance our son must break out of the pot that holds us in. (Steinbeck, pg. 103)Steinbeck here shows what that the Native Americans see lack of education as a pot that holds us in. This also shows that they do not get any chances to learn, for if they did, then they would have more than one chance. As the only way they can learn is to be taught by an educated person, and the only educated people are the colonists, the colonists must be withholding education. This shows that the colonists might be intentionally trying to keep the Native Americans in their pot. It is also interesting that this pot is probably the same as the shell that the Native Americans hide in.He did not know, and perhaps this doctor did. And he could not take the chance of pitting his certain ignorance against this mans possible knowledge. He was trapped as his people were always trapped, and would be un til they could be sure that the things in the books were really in the books. (Steinbeck, pg. 76)This shows an example of how the colonists use education to control the Native American population. He was trapped as hispeople were always trapped, and would be untilthey could be sure that the things in the books were really in the books. This specific sub-phrase shows how his people trusted the books as undeviating sources, information that the colonists must have planted.If the colonists planted the knowledge that the books were reliable, being the only people who could read the books, anything and everything that they said about the books, if not a lie, was true. And as the Native Americans did not know when people were lying, anything that a colonist said could be definitely accurate, or a lie. The risk seemed too much and the Native Americans commonly did as they said, as Kino does, because they are afraid of matching their certain ignorance against the colonists possible knowle dge.Steinbeck also continually shows that the colonists use their control of religion, through their knowledge of education, as another way of controlling the Native American populace.It was a good idea, but it was against religionThe loss of the pearls was a punishment visited on those who tried to consecrate their station. And the father made it clear that each man and woman isa soldier sent by god to guard some partof the human race.But each one must remain faithful to his post and must not go running about, else the castle is in danger from the assaults of Hell. (Steinbeck, pg. 42)This shows that the colonists use their knowledge of religion, due to their reading ability, to keep the Native Americans thinking that they are doing Gods will, or, if they believe otherwise, do so out of fear of being incorrect. The colonists tell the Native Americans that they have to stay in their current position in life, living as poor peasants who treat the colonists as royalty, because that t hat is Gods will. Because the Native Americans are unsure of what is correct, they take what is, to them, the safer approach, by doing as the colonists say.The colonists also bring in faith, by saying that if they are not faithful to their post, and thus not faithful to their religion, which would be considered blasphemy by the religious Native Americans, then they would be in danger of the attack from the assaults of hell, which could beinterpreted as going to hell, which the religious Native Americans would be very afraid of.I heard him make that sermonhe makes it every year.This shows that the colonists try to keep the Native Americans in line, and that it is, again, a group effort and that the entire colonist community works as one in achieving their goal, the exploitation of the Native American society. This also shows that they do this repeatedly, and probably have for been using the same methods for centuries. This also shows that this oppression is not a one-time thing, and that it is a continuous, calculated, malicious oppression of a race.Steinbeck has shown throughout The Pearl his opinions on the differences between the colonists and the Native Americans by showing their relationship, as the type of relationship is based upon the differences of its members. Steinbeck shows this through the differences between town and village, instinct, and education. Steinbeck portrays the colonists as aggressive, abusive, and manipulative throughout the book, especially towards the Native Americans. The Native Americans are portrayed as obedient, acknowledgeable, and living as underlings for the colonist society.The Pearl by John Steinbeck. The Viking Press & William Heinemann, 1947. ISBN 0-14-017737-X