Thursday, May 16, 2019

Reasons Why Cloning is Unethical Essay

From the day that Dolly the sheep made it to the headline news, the rivalry regarding her existence has never ceased. It is quite amazing, how the issues surrounding a sheep could create such a great apportion on public opinion, stir up much debate in scientific halls, and whose implications caused a predicament that reached a magnitude which needed a presidential decision. Needless to say, the debate did non concern factory farm or animal rights, but on how she came to be by copy.Contrary to popular belief, these clinical ventures though, were non make by sheer sense of adventurism, or by simple acts of gentleman arrogance of contend God. Instead, this break through in the field of biotechnology, along with opposite related cases, was carried out with the legitimate subprogram of propagating livestock that carry desirable traits. Breeders can easily then overdress farm animals that have the preferred traits and thus increase productivity and yield. Also, lab research for the noble intention of developing drugs, require many testing on animals in the first place it can finally be declared effective and safe for human use.Cloning would allow them to formulate test-animals that display similar or identical characteristics and thus help formalise results. There are several some other reasons why cloning is held by many scientists as an prerequisite means for improving human condition. However, such so-called conditions had now been raised to the point of fulfilling needs other than physical necessities. Mans many woes and flaws in life such as the pain of losing a loved one or tikeless couples having to bear the unfulfilled desire of loving and rearing their feature children, are just a few of the many disadvantages that confronts finite man.Today through science, man is inclination to challenge and correct these impractical odds. Would cloning be the answer? II. Mans Contemporary secondary Merits of Cloning-to Produce-Children Distinguish ed British philosopher Mary Warnock, expressed her support in favour of utilizing the technology of cloning to produce children. She believes that there is nothing wrong with this operation and thereby there should be no question on the ethical soundness of such an endeavour (Connor, 2002). Together with the rest of those who agree with her, they believe that cloning offers an polished solution for the following problemsA. To Help Sterile Parent/s Obtain Biologically Related Children Individuals or parents who long to have their own offspring, but are hindered by sterility or some other reason the only presented solution so far have been adoption. There are different reasons why some had found this unsatisfactory. With cloning, a sterile man can now have the opportunity of producing a child that bears his own characteristics. The need to find a sperm donor is eliminated, and consequently eliminates the opening move of their child acquiring and passing on undesirable traits to fu ture generation outside the couple.Such a regularity in any case opens for an attractive possibility not only for sterile couples but for homosexual couples and individuals who desire to raise a child of their own but do not want the entanglements of a marriage union. B. Pass-on a Genetic Disease Individuals or parents who carry defective genes such as a genetic malady can now hope to eliminate passing the disease to the following generations. Cloning would assure the parents of creation able to raise children who will not be troubled by the heritable disorder. C. Pain of Losing a Loved OneThe grief of losing a loved one can now be palliate by cloning the dying or dead significant person. Since cloning involves the passing on of withdraw physical characteristics, producing a cloned individual would invariably cause replication of the deceased loved one or coitus. Those who are left, will be comforted by seeing their dead spouse, child or relative live again on the cloned indi vidual. Although, there would be major differences in experiences which would make it entirely impossible to make an exact copy of an individual in all aspects, cloning would bring a link of the lost loved one with the grieving members.D. Societys Desire to Have Individuals with Superior Abilities or Qualities Cloning brings families and societies to have super-human individuals by cloning outstanding athletes, musicians, men and women renowned for their beauty, or geniuses. By replicating these individuals, it is presumed that these maestro qualities are determined by certain genetic make-up and thus, will be passed on through cloning. III. Reasons for Argument Cloning violates the ethics of human experimentation on the following grounds A. Concern on Safety Of utmost concern when cloning humans is the high risk involved.As of the moment, the cloning procedure being done in experimenting mammals has shown how unsafe it is to be even applied in humans. Many embryos got indolent a s it took 277 attempts before finally producing Dolly the sheep (Gawler, 2000). Barely just being six years darkened later, Dolly became severely ill and had to be submitted for euthanasia. Careful examination revealed that her chromosomes had shown premature signs of aging (Cloning). The possibility of creating inborn abnormalities or congenital defects caused by the procedure should even bring parents with a hereditary disease not to employ cloning.While it could hold promise of not passing on genetic diseases to their child, the latter(prenominal) is also vulnerable for congenital malformation. Also, since several donor eggs and substitute mothers are needed before achieving success, this places risks on several women. Experiments on animals had shown that there is high occurrence of premature abortion on cloned fetuses. If done on humans, continous abortion could lead to greater possibility of maternal death. B. The Issue of Consent Cloning also undermines the right of the clon ed individual.In contrast to the risks that could bring to surrogate mother or the gene donor, the risks posed at the cloned individual do not have the individuals consent. Most often, the right to exercise granting immunity is often called by those who promote it. This is often based on the exemption to reproduce. This means that the institution protects individuals or parents to freely choose whether they are to have children or not (Eisenstadt v. Baird, 1972). However, in exercising that right, it overrides the freedom of choice on the cloned individual.True, reproductive freedom permits anybody to decide whether to have a child or not without hindrances by the government. It does not however, in any way, allow anyone to do it by whatever means and in complete disregard for the welfare of others. C. Possible Exploitation of Women Since cloning requires numerous tests before any attempts could develop fruitful, large quantity of donor eggs will be needed. Getting the egg would subject the charr donor of hormonal treatment that gives high health risks.Furthermore, what would most likely happen is that these women donors would be offered a substantial amount of money, and thus could lure poor women to compromise their health in exchange for financial gain (Council on Bioethics, 2002). IV. Conclusion More often, the concern for caoutchouc is limited on the aspect of confining or perfecting the procedure. It does not consider the possible undesirable effects it would have after it is accomplished. This perspective of safety does not take regard on the unexpected effects it would have on the individual, family involved and federation in general.The relationships between members of those with cloned children would greatly be altered compared to conventional family set-up. Would the cloned individual of a father be his child or twin? Obviously, cloning will rearrange how family relations will be treated. earlier any attempts to cloning-to-produce childre n be done, would be parent/s should give grave concern on the effectiveness psychological effects this would have on the one being cloned. What also needs special consideration is its the social impact caused by confusion.Cloning might open for unnecessary expensive wakeless battles, over custody as to who really are the childs parents. Each individual who has a part of the cloned child might fight to claim for custody over the child. Given that such agamogenetic means to produce children is not strange, faulty or imperfect, there is serious error on the affair by which it longs for implementation. It places more significance on the one which will be cloned by replicating the person, rather than the cloned child. charitable experience has revealed that man has the tendency to abuse, and therefore such technology can be used for self-conceited reasons.Cloning somehow claims to provide solutions for mans problems, the solution however, creates more problems. Given the demerits o f the cause, it would far upbeat society to keep from toying with strange methods. Works Cited 1. Connor, S. (2002). Warnock No ethical reason to ban cloning. The Independent. Retrieved 20 Nov. 2008 2. Gawler, DM. Human cloning Scientific, ethical and regulatory issues. Electronic Version Retrieved 20 Nov.2008

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.